'The undermining of the U.S. copyright system is an urgent matter that needs to be addressed now!'

DataRevenue.Org -'A new revenue stream is unfolding - MMS'
This page is dedicated to open letters to the U.S. government and other stakeholders regarding our initiatives for establishing statutory rate(s) for the distribution and publication of copyrighted multimedia, (MMS) on mobile networks.

Does the DMCA Provide Safe Harbor to Mobile Networks........
CTIA Survey Shows 24.3 Billion MMS 2nd Half of 2009

What the Wireless Carriers Don't Want You to Know About Multimedia Messaging - MMS
Copyrights And Mobile Networks - Is This The Beginning Of An End To The Madness?
Cisco predicts mobile video will explode!

More than 4 billion MMS flowed through Verizon's network in Q4 2009!
Verizon to revamp pricing?
Metered Broadband?

How Do the Wireless Carriers Infringe Thee? - Let Me Count the Ways
NEW - The DataRevenue.Org Doctrine

SUBJECT:  The Undermining of the U.S. Copyright System

To The Library of Congress,

Here and now we live in a self- publishing society thanks to the Internet and related technologies.  The undermining of the U.S. copyright system by peer2peer file sharing abuse is an urgent matter that needs to be addressed now before it is too late.

The good news is that there is a way to strengthen the integrity of the U.S. copyright system going forward if implemented promptly.  We must act now.  Please don’t place our request to be heard by persons of authority into the non-productive maze of passing the buck.  These are urgent issues that we have spent years researching.  We are very pleased to say we have a solution.

                                                                                          Background

The Internet was opened to public uses

As the United States Defense Department moved to enable commercialization of the Internet there were meticulous considerations regarding The Domain Name System and related issues.  ICANN, a nonprofit organization contracted by The Department of Commerce led the way in the administration and eventual privatization of the Domain system.  By most standards this was an excellent model of transitioning from a government entity to privatization.  The foresight in understanding the repercussions of NOT having a plan for Domains going forward is highly commendable.

But ironically, that same foresight was grossly absent in considering the repercussions that public use of the Internet would have upon the U.S. copyright system.

If the Betamax Case was a Supreme Court precedent setting event, what in the world were we thinking by unleashing the Internet without addressing the copyright issues beforehand?  The Internet coupled with a personal computer is the most powerful copying and publishing mechanism man has ever known!

Therefore, it was the government’s responsibility to ensure that rights holders’ interests were protected before unleashing the greatest copying and publishing mechanism ever and it was the government’s responsibility to insure that ISP’s, (Internet Service Providers), would be in compliance or they would NOT be issued clearance to be an ISP. 

Basically, a statutory rate should have been established.  Whereas, whenever copyrighted materials were downloaded, (this is a form of distribution and publication), via an ISP the rate would kick in to be deposited with a designated collective that represented the interests of ALL rights holders.

It is my guess that The Library of Congress was not privy to the conversation.

The Solution - Mobile Networks

Mobile networks contain the Internet within

As we move towards a mobile future it is important to know there is another opportunity to put measures in place before they become a problem to the U.S. copyright system.

As I mentioned in my first correspondence to you, within 5 to 10 years we will more likely than not be able to send an entire movie from one mobile device directly to another mobile device, (peer2peer).  A statutory rate will make that a productive event.  What if there is nothing in place?

We have a plan for implementation.

Conclusion

Regarding our petition for rulemaking before the CRB, we were already informed by Judge Sledge that there was not an existing statute that would enable the CRB to act upon our proposal.  That is why we began and continue to solicit Congresspersons and Senators on the Judiciary Committees.  We have also solicited the NTIA and Department of Commerce for help in the development of our work.

Regarding further funding, we understand the Library of Congress may not have resources available for such a thing.

However, your attentions and concerted actions will be much more valuable to our movement than direct funding.

We are very hopeful that this correspondence causes actions on your part as it is our firm belief that this is the right time to move on this because there is no time to waste.

With all due respect, as of now, The Library of Congress IS privy to the conversation.

Best regards,
/max davis/


a nonprofit organization
22647 Ventura Blvd #145
Woodland Hills, CA  91364
 

President Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
2024562461                                                                      RE: Open Letter to the Library of Congress

Dear Mr. President,

Please take a few moments to read the attached open letter to the Library of Congress.  These are urgent issues that can be resolved if we move promptly. 

This is our way of keeping The Executive Branch in the loop.  Thank you very much for your considerations.

Best regards,
/max davis/

SUBJECT:  Telcos, Copyrights and P2P
_________________,

It was nice meeting you Wednesday at the CES P2P panel.  Those young turks are game when it comes to debating pro-copyrights or anti-copyrights but they rarely offer any doable solutions for the good of the whole.

We're, (http://datarevenue.org), actually doing something productive going forward.  I hope that we can get something going together to further the cause as our initiatives will have a vast positive impact for rights holders and legalized P2P.

I'm attaching a few links and docs to help get you up to speed.  One of our members, Luvdarts LLC just submitted "Notices of Infringement" to the top 4 U.S carriers about 30 days ago.  Next, they will be sending "take down" notices per DMCA Sect 512(c).  Well of course this will be virtually impossible for mobile networks to do and we do so to point out the vulnerabilities in their new MMS model.  Each MMS transaction earns them MMS data revenue.  Can they really say they didn't know the end user was sending and receiving someone's copyrighted multimedia?

More importantly, can they say they didn't profit from those transactions?

There are a number of ways you can help.  Let's start with understanding and go from there.  Also, time is of the essence as this is truly an opportunity to get the Telcos to the table.
Luvdarts LLC to File a Three Billion Dollar Copyright Infringement ...
DataRevenueOrg is a nonprofit trade association that believes there should be ... Max Davis Founder of DataRevenueOrg to Speak on Panel at Third Annual P2P ...

SUBJECT:  Telcos, Copyrights and P2P (2)

__________________,

As a young turk you could help show the Mike Masnicks, (techdirt.com) of the world that http://datarevenue.org does not believe that the Internet generation is a bunch of pirates stealing copyrighted works whenever possible.

It is not our youth's fault the Internet was unleashed with little regard to the undermining of an existing system, U.S. Copyrights.  P2P file sharing is primarily a preferred way to obtain stuff in our youth's mind and that's all they know.  Big labels didn't help much by trying to ram things down our youth's throats with non-productive reactionary measures.  Thing is.....they are also victims.

The telcos are the backbone of the Internet and they along with some inefficiencies within our gov set these things in motion.

MMS on mobile networks is a new opportunity to apply these things in a fair way for all;

1.  legalized sharing with monetization of that sharing taking place in the background via telco throughput rates - nothing shared, nothing charged

2.  rights holders share in the pooling of that rate - new revenue stream

3.  Telcos are insulated from infringement and no more getting a free ride "consciously" transporting and profiting from other's copyrighted materials

Understanding our position and spreading the word would be a great first step.

Becoming a "governing member" would be a great next step.

md

SUBJECT:  Reaching Out to the Wireless Carriers


a nonprofit organization
22647 Ventura Blvd #145
Woodland Hills, CA  91364
datarevenue.org@gmail.com

 

December 21, 2009

                                                                        RE: Open Letter to Wireless Carriers

Dear Wireless Carriers,

I am contacting you today because there are copyright infringement issues on mobile networks that are on the verge of litigation, (Luvdarts LLC et al vs U.S. Wireless Carriers).  My organization feels that this can be avoided and/or mitigated with open lines of communications between the principles.

DataRevenue.Org is a non-profit trade association that has been soliciting, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, The FCC, WTB, NTIA, Department of Commerce, Library of Congress and the Executive Branch regarding the undermining of the United States copyright system.  This undermining is a result of the Internet and related technologies providing unfettered access to copyrighted materials along with other information that ultimately promotes the growth of human knowledge.  The Internet is an awesome vehicle; however, in the study of master systems, systems and sub-systems of sub-systems, it becomes obvious that the laws of cause and effect hold true.

Wireless carriers have recently departed from a condition of “dumb pipelines” to a condition of “willful content distributors”.  In doing so, that created areas of vulnerability that will eventually result in a large amount of preventable copyright litigation against wireless carriers.  Based upon existing U.S. copyright laws wireless carriers will most likely have many tough battles ahead.  This scenario is definitely preventable.

Verizon’s recent summary judgment vs ASCAP, was an expected outcome by our organization.  Based upon our early evaluation before the summary judgment, we analyzed the issues and were hard pressed to find where there was a direct financial gain in a ringtone’s public performance.

Luvdarts LLC is a member of our organization.  They recently sent “Notices of Infringement” to the four largest U.S. carriers.  The notice is about accountability for multimedia being distributed and published via your mobile network by others that generate MMS data revenue for wireless carriers.

As you begin to deploy your 4g technologies you will once again expose multiple vulnerabilities as you enable the delivery of multimedia in different forms that may or may not originate directly from your servers or server networks.

These copyright issues are only a few vulnerabilities we have found in your model going forward.  These issues are ALL addressable at this time with your cooperation.

ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, HARRY FOX, APA, DGA, SOUNDEXCHANGE and other PROs and mechanical rights organizations are NOT chartered for multimedia.  Therefore, as you continue to evolve your networks, you will have to deal with each and every increment along the way to provide accountability and segregation for all of these and other stake holding organizations on behalf of their member’s rights.

The answer is for wireless carriers to advocate for an organization that IS chartered for multimedia. That organization should have as its members, organizations like ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, HARRY FOX, APA, DGA, SOUNDEXCHANGE and other multimedia stakeholders.

That organization is DataRevenue.Org.  We hereby extend this invitation to wireless carriers to open up the dialogue to help establish what is necessary to insulate wireless carriers against further copyright infringement on mobile networks for the good of the whole.

Implementing the above dialogue includes the joint development of initiatives that will cover all areas of copyrighted multimedia culpability on mobile networks utilizing unified efficient visions of technology’s effects upon the consolidation of the media going forward.

Best regards,
/max davis/

 

how you can help


Member dues, contributions or gifts to DataRevenue.Org are not tax deductible as charitable contributions. However, they are usually tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expenses under other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.

disclosure definitions structure how you can help questions & answers
governor's benefits associate's benefits petitions for rulemaking founder's message the board of advisors
donate here! introduction data optimized products membership kits data revenue dialogues
links to related info articles about us

contact us

join the mission! other
         

'It is time to look ahead and prepare for things to come.'